Free Online Flashcard Deck

2 Working with Historical Sources Free Online FlashCards

Study 2 Working with Historical Sources with 12 free online flashcards. Review key terms, definitions, and concepts with this interactive flashcard deck.

12 cards
01
Front

What is a primary source?

Back

A primary source was created during the period or events being studied, or by someone with direct experience of them.

02
Front

Why can a source’s primary or secondary status depend on the research question?

Back

The categories depend on the research question: a textbook about an earlier event is secondary, but it can be primary evidence for how history was taught when it appeared.

03
Front

How does an observation differ from an inference about a source?

Back

An observation describes what the source contains; an inference interprets what that content may mean. For example, a letter asking for more workers is an observation, while concluding that the writer feared a labor shortage is an inference.

04
Front

What should you consider when examining a source’s authorship?

Back

Ask who created it and how the creator’s role, knowledge, beliefs, or interests may have shaped the perspective.

05
Front

What does a source’s intended audience help you assess?

Back

Identify who was expected to read, hear, or view it; a private letter to a trusted friend may differ from a public speech aimed at voters.

06
Front

What is a source’s purpose?

Back

Purpose is why a source was made. It may have been intended to inform, persuade, record, justify, entertain, or commemorate.

07
Front

How can historical context help explain a source?

Back

Historical context means the political, social, economic, and cultural conditions of the time that can help explain a source’s language, choices, and silences.

08
Front

Does bias automatically make a historical source useless?

Back

Bias does not automatically make a source useless or false. A persuasive speech may still reveal what its speaker wanted an audience to believe.

09
Front

What is corroboration in historical research?

Back

Corroboration is comparing sources to identify where they agree, differ, or leave gaps.

10
Front

Why might agreement among several sources be less convincing than it seems?

Back

Agreement strengthens a conclusion most when accounts are independent. Several sources may repeat the same original report or share the same limitations.

11
Front

What can disagreement between historical sources reveal?

Back

Disagreement may reveal different interests, experiences, or interpretations, making it historically valuable rather than merely a problem to resolve.

12
Front

What factors help determine what a source can establish?

Back

Assess whether it is complete, accurate, representative, and close in time to the events it describes; also consider omissions, unfamiliar terms, editing, translation, and preservation.