True or false: A primary source is automatically reliable because it was created during the period being studied.
3 Evidence and Source Evaluation Online Quiz Questions
Use this free practice quiz with 20 questions to review 3 Evidence and Source Evaluation, test your knowledge, and prepare for your next test or exam.
A historian compares accounts of an event to identify where they agree, differ, or leave gaps. What is this method called?
A historian writes an interpretation of an event several decades after it happened. How is the historian's work classified?
- A
A primary source
- B
A secondary source
- C
An unresolved claim
A sound historical argument links a to relevant evidence and explains the reasoning that connects them.
A report about a town meeting does not mention whether a particular vote took place. What is the most justified conclusion from that omission alone?
- A
The event definitely did not happen.
- B
The document is useless as evidence for every claim.
- C
The omission alone does not establish whether the event happened.
You are evaluating a document as evidence for a historical claim. Which questions or considerations are useful? Select all that apply.
- A
Identify who created the source and when.
- B
Consider why it was created and for whom.
- C
Separate what it directly says from your inferences.
- D
Treat the source as reliable if it sounds plausible.
- E
Consider the creator's access, perspective, or reasons to persuade.
True or false: A historical claim is supported if it sounds plausible and appears in a source.
- A
True
- B
False
Two accounts give conflicting descriptions of an event, and no other evidence resolves the disagreement. How should the claim about what happened be classified?
Several accounts repeat the same claim about an event. Which steps would help determine whether they provide independent corroboration? Select all that apply.
- A
Check whether the accounts may have copied the same report.
- B
Count every repetition as a separate confirmation.
- C
Look for accounts from different people or institutions.
- D
Assume that agreement makes further investigation unnecessary.
When reliable evidence contradicts a historical claim, the claim is .
A shopkeeper's diary describes the writer's own views about a new town policy. What can the diary, by itself, best support?
- A
The diary establishes what the entire town believed.
- B
The diary may support a claim about its writer's experience, but alone may not support a claim about the whole town.
- C
The diary cannot be evidence because it is a personal account.
A public speech and a private diary describe the same event differently. What is the most careful first interpretation of that difference?
- A
The speech must be false because it was public.
- B
The sources may differ because they served different purposes and audiences; evaluate each in context.
- C
The diary must be more reliable because it was private.
True or false: A historical conclusion may need revision when new sources are considered.
- A
True
- B
False
One account says a town meeting was crowded, while another describes many empty seats. Explain how a historian should handle this disagreement and what kinds of checks could help evaluate the accounts.
A historian has a photograph and a later textbook chapter about a town’s buildings. What is the soundest way to decide which source is more useful for determining what one particular building looked like at the time the photograph was taken?
- A
A primary source is always more reliable than a secondary source.
- B
The source’s usefulness depends on the specific question and claim being tested.
- C
A source is useful only if it was created by an eyewitness.
- D
A source with a point of view cannot provide useful evidence.
A private diary and a public speech give different descriptions of the same event. Which approach would best help a historian assess the difference?
- A
Assume that a public speech is more accurate because it was meant for a large audience.
- B
Treat a private diary as fully accurate because it was not written for the public.
- C
Consider how each source’s purpose and audience may have shaped its account.
- D
Disregard both sources because they describe the same event differently.
Three publications report the same detail about an event, but evidence suggests that all three used one original report. What should a historian do before treating the detail as independently corroborated?
- A
Check whether the accounts relied on independent reporting or copied the same report.
- B
Count each account as separate confirmation because it appears in a different publication.
- C
Prefer whichever account was written most recently.
- D
Treat the repeated claim as established regardless of the accounts’ origins.
One account describes a meeting as crowded, while another says many seats were empty. What is the most appropriate next step for a historian?
- A
Accept the account with the more detailed description as true.
- B
Average the descriptions and treat the result as established.
- C
Discard both accounts because they disagree.
- D
Investigate the difference and seek additional evidence.
What is the historical method of comparing sources to see where they agree, differ, or leave gaps?
What classification applies when the available evidence is insufficient or conflicting and does not justify treating a claim as established?