Free Online Flashcard Deck

2 Methods of Political Analysis Free Online FlashCards

Study 2 Methods of Political Analysis with 12 free online flashcards. Review key terms, definitions, and concepts with this interactive flashcard deck.

12 cards
01
Front

What makes a political research question empirically useful?

Back

A focused empirical question identifies the outcome, a possible explanation, and the people, places, or period being studied; it must be answerable with evidence.

02
Front

How do a theory and a hypothesis differ?

Back

A theory proposes an explanation; a hypothesis states a clear expectation that observations could support or count against.

03
Front

What is conceptualization in political research?

Back

Conceptualization clarifies what a concept means in a particular study.

04
Front

What does operationalization specify?

Back

Operationalization specifies how a concept will be observed or measured.

05
Front

What is a dependent variable?

Back

The dependent variable is the outcome a study seeks to explain.

06
Front

What is a study’s unit of analysis?

Back

The unit of analysis is the kind of entity being studied, such as voters, elections, parties, districts, or countries.

07
Front

What does validity assess?

Back

Validity is the extent to which a measure captures the concept it is intended to measure.

08
Front

What makes a comparison informative?

Back

Researchers should define cases and outcomes consistently and explain why those cases were selected.

09
Front

What can qualitative evidence clarify that quantitative evidence often summarizes?

Back

Quantitative evidence summarizes patterns across many observations; qualitative evidence can clarify meanings, sequences, and how political processes unfold.

10
Front

How does a causal claim differ from an association?

Back

Association means factors vary together; a causal claim says a change in one factor produces a change in another.

11
Front

What makes a factor a confounder?

Back

A confounder is a factor related to both the proposed cause and the outcome, offering a possible alternative explanation.

12
Front

Why can random assignment strengthen causal inference?

Back

Random assignment can make treatment and comparison groups similar on average, supporting causal inference.