A host makes repeated, regular outbound connections to an unfamiliar destination. Which interpretation best fits this observation?
5 Indicators of Compromise Online Quiz Questions
Use this free practice quiz with 20 questions to review 5 Indicators of Compromise, test your knowledge, and prepare for your next test or exam.
True or false: A match to an indicator of compromise automatically proves that a system was compromised and identifies who caused it.
- A
True
- B
False
What reference is used to judge whether activity is unusual for a user or system?
Host-based indicators come from or their logs.
An account runs discovery commands and then moves laterally to another system. Which kind of indicator best describes this sequence?
- A
A host-based indicator, because it must identify a suspicious file
- B
A network-based indicator, because it must identify a remote IP address
- C
A behavior-based indicator, because it describes a sequence of actions
Which actions help validate a reported IOC match? Select all that apply.
- A
Record the exact observation and relevant source, asset, account, and event time
- B
Treat a reputation label as proof that the local match is malicious
- C
Verify that the value matches and that the event occurred on the reported asset and within the relevant time period
- D
Correlate related host, network, identity, or application events
What concise term describes recurring, regular outbound connections that may indicate command-and-control activity?
An IOC match may connect an event to a known campaign or tool, but it does not by itself prove .
True or false: If searches for known indicators return no matches, compromise can be ruled out.
- A
True
- B
False
A threat report lists a file hash as an IOC. Which check most directly confirms that the reported match applies to a local event?
- A
Assume the match is malicious if the indicator has a reputation label
- B
Verify the exact value, reported asset, and relevant time period
- C
Search only for the same value on unrelated assets
- D
Treat missing event data as proof that no match occurred
An unusual privilege change is detected on a server. Which checks can help test benign explanations? Select all that apply.
- A
Compare the event with known maintenance
- B
Check whether approved software could explain the activity
- C
Assume an unusual action is malicious without checking context
- D
Compare the activity with scheduled jobs, security scans, and normal activity for the user or system
Why should an analyst consider when an IOC was observed and whether it may be stale?
- A
A match always identifies the same actor, even when infrastructure is shared
- B
A non-match proves that the system is safe
- C
An old match may no longer describe current malicious activity because indicators can change or be reused
- D
A unique file hash detects every changed version of that file
An alert reports an unusual outbound connection from a workstation. Describe how an analyst should investigate it before deciding whether to escalate or contain.
An exact match to a published indicator of compromise proves that the local event was malicious. True or false?
- A
True
- B
False
An investigator finds an unfamiliar scheduled task on a server. Which category best describes this indicator?
- A
Host-based indicator
- B
Network-based indicator
- C
Behavior-based indicator
A host connects to an IP address associated with malicious activity, but the address belongs to a shared hosting service. What is the most appropriate next step?
- A
Treat every connection to a shared hosting address as malicious
- B
Ignore the match because shared infrastructure cannot be used maliciously
- C
Investigate the connection alongside its destination, process, user, and related events
- D
Conclude that the hosting provider operated the suspected attack
When deciding whether a user's activity is unusual, what reference should an analyst compare it against?
A published indicator is a file hash, and an alert reports a possible match. Which action best confirms whether the indicator applies to the event?
- A
Assume that a reputation label is sufficient if the indicator is published
- B
Verify the exact value, asset, and time period, then examine relevant file context where available
- C
Confirm only that the indicator appears in a threat-intelligence source
- D
Treat any similar-looking value on any asset as a confirmed match
When documenting shared or published intelligence, what stated assessment should be recorded alongside its source and observation time?
An unusual outbound connection is followed by unexpected credential activity and a persistence change. Which analysis would provide the strongest additional support for investigating a possible compromise?
- A
Classify the event based only on the reputation of its destination
- B
Search only for the same indicator value on the original system
- C
Correlate related host, network, identity, and application events for a plausible sequence
- D
Attribute the activity to the first campaign associated with the indicator