Free Online Flashcard Deck

07 Rights of the Accused and Personal Privacy Free Online FlashCards

Study 07 Rights of the Accused and Personal Privacy with 12 free online flashcards. Review key terms, definitions, and concepts with this interactive flashcard deck.

12 cards
01
Front

What does the Fourth Amendment protect?

Back

The Fourth Amendment protects people, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

02
Front

What makes a search warrant constitutionally valid?

Back

A warrant ordinarily must be based on probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly identify the place, persons, or things involved.

03
Front

What is a Fourth Amendment search?

Back

A search occurs when the government intrudes on a constitutionally protected privacy or property interest.

04
Front

What principle did Katz v. United States establish?

Back

Under Katz, people—not merely physical places—receive Fourth Amendment protection when they have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

05
Front

What justifies a Terry stop?

Back

Reasonable suspicion requires specific, articulable facts suggesting that criminal activity is occurring, has occurred, or is about to occur.

06
Front

What is the lawful purpose and scope of a Terry frisk?

Back

A frisk is limited to an outer-clothing search for weapons when an officer reasonably suspects the person is armed and dangerous.

07
Front

What did Riley v. California hold about cell phones?

Back

Police generally need a warrant to search the digital contents of a cell phone seized from an arrested person.

08
Front

What did Carpenter v. United States hold?

Back

Carpenter held that obtaining historical cell-site location information is generally a Fourth Amendment search requiring a warrant.

09
Front

What is the exclusionary rule?

Back

The exclusionary rule generally prevents the government from using evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search or seizure in its criminal case.

10
Front

What did Mapp v. Ohio establish?

Back

Mapp v. Ohio applied the exclusionary rule to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

11
Front

What does the privilege against self-incrimination protect?

Back

The Fifth Amendment privilege protects against compelled testimonial communication, but generally does not bar valid collection of physical evidence such as fingerprints or blood samples.

12
Front

When are Miranda warnings generally required?

Back

Miranda warnings are generally required before custodial interrogation and include the rights to remain silent and consult an attorney, plus appointed counsel for those unable to afford one.