True or false: A Fourth Amendment warrant must ordinarily be supported by probable cause and particularity.
07 Rights of the Accused and Personal Privacy Online Quiz Questions
Use this free practice quiz with 20 questions to review 07 Rights of the Accused and Personal Privacy, test your knowledge, and prepare for your next test or exam.
Which statement best describes the rule from Terry v. Ohio for a protective frisk?
- A
An officer may frisk anyone whom the officer has reasonable suspicion has committed a crime.
- B
An officer may frisk a stopped person when the officer reasonably suspects that the person is armed and dangerous.
- C
An officer may frisk a stopped person to search for any evidence the officer expects to find.
- D
An officer may frisk a person only after obtaining a warrant.
True or false: Whenever a constitutional violation occurs during an investigation, the criminal case must automatically be dismissed.
- A
True
- B
False
After a lawful arrest, which statement best reflects Riley v. California?
- A
Police may never seize a cell phone during an arrest.
- B
Police may always search the digital contents of a seized cell phone without a warrant.
- C
Police generally must obtain a warrant before searching the digital contents of a cell phone seized from an arrested person.
- D
Police may search digital contents only if the phone is found outside the person's home.
In what year did the Supreme Court decide Carpenter v. United States, the case concerning historical cell-site location information?
Complete the distinction: concerns the methods government must follow, such as notice and an opportunity to be heard; concerns whether government may infringe certain fundamental liberties at all.
Which situation most clearly triggers the general requirement for Miranda warnings?
- A
Any conversation with a police officer, even when completely voluntary and noncustodial.
- B
Questioning a person in custody that is reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.
- C
A police officer's collection of fingerprints from a person under a valid procedure.
- D
A trial judge's questioning of prospective jurors.
True or false: The Sixth Amendment right to counsel is generally tied to a particular criminal prosecution and ordinarily attaches after formal proceedings begin.
- A
True
- B
False
Select all seven rights expressly identified in the Materials as Sixth Amendment trial rights.
- A
A speedy trial
- B
A public trial
- C
An impartial jury
- D
Notice of the accusation
- E
Confrontation of witnesses
- F
Compulsory process to obtain witnesses and evidence
- G
Assistance of counsel
- H
Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures
- I
A guarantee of a civil jury trial in every case
What surname identifies the Supreme Court case holding that police generally may not continue custodial questioning after a suspect clearly invokes the right to counsel?
Complete the statement: Under Gideon v. Wainwright, an indigent defendant charged with a serious offense has a constitutional right to in a state criminal trial.
Select all circumstances identified in the material as examples of exceptions to the strong general preference for a warrant.
- A
Consent
- B
A search incident to a lawful arrest
- C
Exigent circumstances
- D
Automobile searches
- E
Plain view
- F
Certain searches at the border
- G
Any search conducted solely because an officer is curious
- H
Any search of a person who refuses consent
Which situation best illustrates the good-faith exception described in United States v. Leon?
- A
Evidence is admissible whenever police believe a search would be useful.
- B
Evidence is admissible only when the defendant consents after the search.
- C
Evidence may be admitted when officers reasonably relied on a warrant later found to be defective.
- D
Evidence must always be excluded whenever any warrant is later determined to have a defect.
Explain how Katz v. United States changed Fourth Amendment analysis of electronic surveillance. In your answer, state the privacy principle the Court used and explain why the telephone-booth recording could qualify as a search even though officers did not physically enter the booth.
Which constitutional amendment generally provides the basis for applying many Bill of Rights protections to state criminal prosecutions?
- A
The Fifth Amendment
- B
The Fourteenth Amendment
- C
The Sixth Amendment
- D
The First Amendment
An officer has only an unverified tip and observes a person repeatedly entering and leaving a store, without seeing any criminal conduct. Under the principles of Terry v. Ohio, which showing would generally be required before the officer may conduct a brief investigative stop?
- A
A warrant supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt
- B
Probable cause that the person has committed a felony
- C
Reasonable suspicion based on specific and articulable facts
- D
The officer's personal intuition without supporting facts
Police attach a listening device to the outside of a public telephone booth and record a person's conversation without entering the booth. Which principle from Katz v. United States most directly explains why this may be a Fourth Amendment search?
- A
A reasonable expectation of privacy in the conversation
- B
Ownership of the telephone booth by the person being recorded
- C
Physical entry by officers into the telephone booth
- D
A warrant whenever officers observe a person in public
Police lawfully arrest a person and seize the person's cell phone. Under Riley v. California, what is the general constitutional rule for examining the phone's digital contents?
- A
The phone may always be searched because it is smaller than a briefcase
- B
The phone may never be seized during an arrest
- C
A warrant is unnecessary if the phone contains only photographs
- D
Police generally need a warrant to search the phone's digital contents
A police officer wants to make a brief investigative stop based on specific and articulable facts suggesting that criminal activity may be occurring. Enter the required constitutional standard as a two-word legal term.
Enter the U.S. Supreme Court case name that held police generally need a warrant to search the digital contents of a cell phone seized from an arrested person.