Free Online Flashcard Deck

08/10 Evaluating Ethical Arguments Free Online FlashCards

Study 08/10 Evaluating Ethical Arguments with 12 free online flashcards. Review key terms, definitions, and concepts with this interactive flashcard deck.

12 cards
01
Front

What are the four components of an ethical argument?

Back

An ethical argument contains premises, a conclusion, an inference connecting them, and background assumptions needed for the reasoning to work.

02
Front

How do validity and soundness differ?

Back

Validity means the conclusion follows from the premises. Soundness requires validity plus true or well-justified premises.

03
Front

What kinds of hidden assumptions should an evaluator identify?

Back

Hidden assumptions may concern empirical outcomes, values, scope, agency, or what the decision-maker knew or could reasonably have known.

04
Front

What standard does consequentialism use?

Back

Consequentialism assesses actions by their outcomes, asking which available action is expected to produce the best overall results.

05
Front

What does universalization test?

Back

Universalization tests whether a principle remains acceptable if roles are reversed or everyone acted on it. It can reveal inconsistency without proving every exception wrong.

06
Front

What is a counterexample in ethical reasoning?

Back

A counterexample challenges a general claim by showing that it produces an implausible result or fails to address an important possibility.

07
Front

What are the three types of uncertainty in ethical decisions?

Back

Factual uncertainty concerns what happened or will happen; moral uncertainty concerns which moral reasons or theories are correct; conceptual uncertainty concerns what a moral concept means in the case.

08
Front

What is the is–ought error?

Back

An is–ought error infers how people ought to behave solely from how they actually behave. A further normative premise is required.

09
Front

How do explanation and justification differ?

Back

Explaining why someone acted identifies causes such as fear or pressure; justifying the action gives moral reasons for considering it permissible or right.

10
Front

What should a qualified ethical conclusion include?

Back

A qualified conclusion states what should be done, gives the reasons, and identifies what information or changed circumstances could alter the judgment.

11
Front

What does deontology emphasize?

Back

Deontology evaluates actions through duties, rights, permissions, and prohibitions, sometimes judging an action wrong even when it produces better consequences.

12
Front

What does virtue ethics assess?

Back

Virtue ethics evaluates character, practical wisdom, motives, relationships, and context, asking what a good or practically wise person would do.