Free Online Flashcard Deck

8/9 8. Reasoning Errors and Informal Fallacies Free Online FlashCards

Study 8/9 8. Reasoning Errors and Informal Fallacies with 12 free online flashcards. Review key terms, definitions, and concepts with this interactive flashcard deck.

12 cards
01
Front

What does ∀\forall mean?

Back

The universal quantifier ∀\forall means “for every,” “all,” or “each.”

02
Front

What does ∃\exists mean?

Back

The existential quantifier ∃\exists means “there exists,” “some,” or “at least one.”

03
Front

Why does the domain of discourse matter?

Back

A quantified statement’s truth can change when its domain changes, because the variables range over different objects.

04
Front

How is “some student passed” formalized?

Back

“Some student passed” is ∃x (Student(x)∧Passed(x))\exists x\,(Student(x)\land Passed(x)); the witness must be both a student and someone who passed.

05
Front

What is a quantifier’s scope?

Back

The scope is the formula governed by a quantifier. In ∀x [P(x)→Q(x)]\forall x\,[P(x)\rightarrow Q(x)], the quantifier governs the entire conditional.

06
Front

How do bound and free variables differ?

Back

A bound variable occurs within a quantifier’s scope; a free variable is not governed by a quantifier and leaves the formula generally open.

07
Front

How do you negate a universal quantifier?

Back

Negation switches the quantifier and negates the predicate: ¬(∀x P(x))≡∃x ¬P(x)\neg(\forall x\,P(x))\equiv\exists x\,\neg P(x).

08
Front

How do you negate an existential quantifier?

Back

Negation switches the quantifier and negates the predicate: ¬(∃x P(x))≡∀x ¬P(x)\neg(\exists x\,P(x))\equiv\forall x\,\neg P(x).

09
Front

What does ∀x ∃y L(x,y)\forall x\,\exists y\,L(x,y) mean?

Back

∀x ∃y L(x,y)\forall x\,\exists y\,L(x,y) allows the liked person to vary with xx; each person likes at least one person.

10
Front

What does ∃y ∀x L(x,y)\exists y\,\forall x\,L(x,y) mean?

Back

∃y ∀x L(x,y)\exists y\,\forall x\,L(x,y) requires one single person whom everyone likes.

11
Front

What refutes “All AA are BB”?

Back

One valid counterexample: an object in the domain that satisfies AA but not BB. Its form is ∃x (A(x)∧¬B(x))\exists x\,(A(x)\land\neg B(x)).

12
Front

What establishes an existential claim?

Back

A witness is one object in the domain that satisfies the predicate. For example, 55 witnesses that some integer is positive and prime.