Free Online Flashcard Deck

9/9 9. Analyzing and Improving Arguments Free Online FlashCards

Study 9/9 9. Analyzing and Improving Arguments with 12 free online flashcards. Review key terms, definitions, and concepts with this interactive flashcard deck.

12 cards
01
Front

What is a proposition?

Back

A proposition is a declarative statement that is either true or false. Questions, commands, and exclamations are not propositions.

02
Front

How do premises differ from conclusions?

Back

Premises are propositions offered as support for a conclusion, which is the proposition the argument attempts to establish.

03
Front

How do validity and soundness differ?

Back

Validity concerns whether true premises can lead to a false conclusion. Soundness requires validity plus premises that are actually true.

04
Front

How does a truth table test an argument?

Back

A truth table tests every possible truth-value assignment. An argument is invalid if any row has all premises true and the conclusion false.

05
Front

What is equivocation?

Back

Equivocation uses a key word or phrase with different meanings in different parts of the same argument.

06
Front

What is circular reasoning?

Back

Circular reasoning assumes, directly or indirectly, the conclusion it is supposed to establish, so its premises provide no independent support.

07
Front

What is a false dilemma?

Back

A false dilemma presents only two options even though additional possibilities exist. The alternatives may not be exhaustive or mutually exclusive.

08
Front

What makes an argument ad hominem?

Back

Ad hominem reasoning attacks a person instead of addressing the person’s claim, premises, evidence, or reasoning.

09
Front

How should an argument be revised proportionally?

Back

Improve an argument by narrowing its conclusion, adding evidence, defining terms, or acknowledging uncertainty so the claim does not exceed its support.

10
Front

What are the antecedent and consequent in P→QP \to Q?

Back

In the conditional P→QP \to Q, PP is the antecedent and QQ is the consequent.

11
Front

What do ∀\forall and ∃\exists mean?

Back

The universal quantifier ∀\forall means “for every” or “all,” while the existential quantifier ∃\exists means “there exists” or “at least one.”

12
Front

What is affirming the consequent?

Back

Affirming the consequent: from P→QP \to Q and QQ, concluding PP. The consequent may have other causes, so this form is invalid.