True or false: Repeating measurements automatically removes every source of bias from an investigation.
5 Evaluating Evidence and Improving Investigations Online Quiz Questions
Use this free practice quiz with 20 questions to review 5 Evaluating Evidence and Improving Investigations, test your knowledge, and prepare for your next test or exam.
Evidence is generally when it is collected carefully, measured consistently, and directly addresses the scientific question.
What quality of evidence describes whether a method would produce similar results if repeated under similar conditions?
A student wants to compare how much water different paper towel brands absorb. Which plan would provide the most dependable comparison?
- A
Test one sheet of each brand, using different amounts of water and different soaking times.
- B
Test several sheets of each brand with the same amount of water and the same timing.
- C
Test several sheets of each brand, but change the water amount for each brand.
- D
Test one sheet of each brand and choose the result that best fits the expected pattern.
True or false: If a result does not fit the expected pattern, investigators should discard it without further investigation.
- A
True
- B
False
A classroom investigation compares only a few paper towel brands. Its conclusions should be limited to the conditions and range .
What term names variation that may make a pattern appear even when the results differ by chance rather than a consistent effect?
Seedlings given more light grow taller, but they also received more water than the other seedlings. Which follow-up design would best test whether light affects growth?
- A
Conclude that extra light caused the growth because the seedlings grew taller.
- B
Give the seedlings different amounts of water in a follow-up test.
- C
Keep water, soil, seed type, and other relevant conditions the same while changing the amount of light.
- D
Compare seedlings grown in different soils and with different amounts of water.
Which elements should a scientific report include to help readers evaluate how well a conclusion follows from the evidence? Select all that apply.
- A
State the question investigated and the claim supported by the results.
- B
Describe what was changed, measured, and kept the same, and how measurements were collected.
- C
Present the results, including data that do not fit the expected pattern.
- D
Explain how the results support, challenge, or qualify the claim.
- E
Identify limitations and uncertainty that could affect the conclusion.
- F
Claim that the conclusion is true in every setting, even if only a limited range was tested.
- G
Suggest further tests that could help answer an unresolved question.
A student's measurements vary widely across trials. Which response best uses that evidence to improve the investigation?
- A
Remove results that differ from the average so the pattern is clearer.
- B
Change several parts of the method at once so the next results are different.
- C
Standardize the procedure, consider a more suitable measuring tool, and collect more trials.
- D
Keep the method unchanged and report only the result that occurred most often.
A paper towel comparison produced inconsistent results, and the pieces may have been different sizes. Which changes would improve a follow-up investigation? Select all that apply.
- A
Use equal-sized pieces of each paper towel brand.
- B
Use the same water volume and soaking time for every test.
- C
Use a different water volume for each brand to make differences easier to see.
- D
Repeat the test several times for each brand.
- E
Discard trials that do not match the expected result.
An investigation shows a pattern only over part of the range tested. What is the best next step to determine whether the pattern continues?
- A
Repeat only the measurements from the part of the range where a pattern already appeared.
- B
Collect data at additional values to check whether the pattern continues across a wider range.
- C
Conclude that the pattern applies at all possible values.
- D
Ignore the part of the range where no pattern appeared.
A class finds that Brand A absorbed more water on average than Brand B across five trials, using one measurement method. Write a conclusion that accurately describes what the results support without overgeneralizing. Identify two limitations and suggest a useful next step.
A student wants to compare how much water different paper towel brands absorb. Which method would provide the most dependable comparison?
- A
Test one sheet from each brand, using different amounts of water so each sheet is tested thoroughly.
- B
Test several sheets from each brand using the same amount of water and the same timing.
- C
Test several sheets from one brand and assume the other brands will behave similarly.
- D
Choose the sheet from each brand that looks most absorbent before adding water.
If an investigation includes many repeated measurements, the results are guaranteed to be free of bias.
- A
True
- B
False
A classroom investigation finds that Brand A absorbs more water on average than Brand B in five trials using one measurement method. Which conclusion is best supported by this evidence?
- A
Brand A is the most absorbent brand in every setting.
- B
Every sheet from Brand A absorbs more water than every sheet from other brands.
- C
Brand A absorbed more water on average than Brand B under the conditions tested.
- D
Brand A will absorb more water than any brand that was not included in the test.
Seedlings given more light grow taller, but they also received more water than the other seedlings. What scientific term describes the possibility that the water difference, rather than the light, accounts for the growth pattern?
A student writes a report about an investigation. Which approach best helps readers judge whether the conclusion follows from the evidence?
- A
Report the observed data and explain separately how they support or qualify the claim.
- B
Include only the data that match the expected pattern, then state the claim confidently.
- C
State the claim without describing how the measurements were collected.
- D
Present the interpretation as if it were a direct measurement.
Several measurements in an investigation do not fit the expected pattern. What should the investigator do before drawing a conclusion?
- A
Remove results that do not fit the predicted pattern before deciding what happened.
- B
Investigate the unexpected results and consider whether they reflect variation or a problem with the method.
- C
Repeat the investigation only until the expected pattern appears, then report those results.
- D
Ignore inconsistent results if most measurements support the original claim.
What report component identifies factors that could have affected the results and aspects of the question that were not tested?