04 Atomic Structure and Isotopes
Learn how subatomic particles define atoms and isotopes, how isotope abundances determine average atomic mass, and how experimental evidence refined atomic models.
The : particles and counting
An has a small, dense nucleus surrounded by electrons. The nucleus contains positively charged protons and neutral neutrons; negatively charged electrons occupy the region around it. Protons and neutrons each have a mass close to , while an ’s mass is about of a ’s. Consequently, nearly all an ’s mass is in its nucleus.
The , written as , is the number of protons and determines the element. In a neutral , the number of electrons equals the number of protons. The , written as , counts the protons and neutrons together:
To find the count, subtract the from the :
For example, a neutral sodium-23 has protons, neutrons, and electrons. Its nuclear notation is . The lower-left number gives , and the upper-left number gives .
Takeaway: Protons identify the element; protons plus neutrons give the .
and average atomic mass
are atoms of the same element with different numbers of neutrons. Because they have the same number of protons, they share the same elemental identity. For example, carbon-12 and carbon-13 each have protons, but carbon-12 has neutrons while carbon-13 has . Some are radioactive.
The is a count of nuclear particles, not a measured atomic mass. An isotope’s measured mass is generally not a whole number; nuclear binding energy affects the mass of its nucleus. The is defined so that a carbon-12 has a mass of exactly .
The value commonly listed for an element on the periodic table is a of the masses of its naturally occurring . Each isotope’s contribution depends on its fractional abundance. For two :
Natural carbon is about carbon-12 and carbon-13. Using isotope masses of and , respectively, gives:
This average describes the isotope mixture, not the mass of every individual carbon . If the relative abundances changed, the average would change as well.
Takeaway: differ in count, while an element’s listed atomic mass reflects the masses and abundances of its .
How evidence refined atomic models
Atomic models changed as experiments revealed evidence that earlier models could not explain. helped account for patterns in chemical reactions and the simple whole-number ratios in compounds. Its claim that atoms were indivisible had to be revised as internal structure was discovered.
In cathode-ray experiments, J. J. Thomson observed that rays were deflected by electric and magnetic fields and behaved as negatively charged particles. Their properties were consistent across different electrode materials, supporting the conclusion that electrons are constituents of atoms. Thomson proposed a model in which electrons were embedded in diffuse positive charge.
In the gold-foil experiment, Geiger and Marsden directed positively charged alpha particles at thin gold foil. Most passed through with little deflection, while a small number deflected sharply, some back toward the source. Rutherford’s nuclear model explained this pattern: an is mostly open space, with positive charge and most of its mass concentrated in a tiny nucleus.
In 1932, James Chadwick showed that the nucleus contains a neutral particle with a mass similar to a ’s. This helped explain how atoms of the same element can have different masses: their nuclei can contain different numbers of neutrons.
The modern model retains the nucleus but does not treat electrons as tiny planets following fixed paths. Quantum mechanics describes electrons using orbitals, which represent regions where electrons are likely to be found. Measurements including atomic spectra support this model.
Takeaway: Each new model addressed evidence that earlier models could not fully explain, while retaining useful parts of previous explanations.