2 Utility and Its Representations
Learn how utility functions represent consumer preferences, how marginal utility and the marginal rate of substitution relate, and how Cobb–Douglas and perfect-substitutes preferences behave.
Utility represents preferences
A consumer’s preferences rank possible consumption bundles. A assigns a number to each bundle while preserving that ranking: if bundle is preferred to bundle , then must receive higher utility. For example, if a consumer prefers three apples and two oranges to two apples and two oranges, a representing must assign the first bundle a higher value.
In standard consumer theory, utility is ordinal: it records the order of preference, not a measurable amount of happiness. Therefore, any strictly increasing transformation of a represents the same preferences. If represents preferences, then and , where defined, rank bundles identically. The numerical utility levels themselves have no independent meaning.
and trade-offs
describes how a utility representation changes when consumption of one good increases slightly while consumption of other goods is held constant. For a differentiable , the of is , and the of is .
For example, if , then and . At the bundle , , an additional small amount of has , while an additional small amount of has in this particular representation. These marginal-utility values depend on the chosen representation and are not directly measurable units of satisfaction.
The ratio of marginal utilities gives the : the consumer’s local willingness to trade one good for another while remaining equally preferred. Along an , the of for is . This ratio is unchanged by a differentiable, strictly increasing transformation of utility.
A common representation of is
where and are positive constants. This function represents preferences for both goods and, in the usual case, a willingness to substitute between them.
The marginal utilities are and , giving
As the consumer has more relative to , the amount of they are willing to give up for another unit of falls. For example, represents a preference for a mix of the two goods. For positive quantities, taking the logarithm gives , an equivalent representation because the logarithm is strictly increasing.
and spending
are goods that a consumer is willing to exchange at a constant rate. A standard is
where and are positive constants. Its indifference curves are straight lines, and its is constant: . For example, if , one unit of contributes as much utility in this representation as two units of .
With a budget constraint, the consumer compares the per dollar of each good: for and for . If , buying gives more utility per dollar; if , buying does. The consumer typically spends the budget on the better-value good. If the ratios are equal, every affordable bundle on the budget line provides the same utility.
How the representations differ
Utility functions give a convenient numerical representation of preference rankings, but their numbers are ordinal rather than direct measures of happiness. describes how the representation changes with consumption, while the ratio of marginal utilities gives the . Cobb–Douglas functions represent goods with a changing trade-off; perfect-substitutes functions represent goods exchanged at a constant rate.