Free Online Flashcard Deck

03 Consequentialism and Utilitarianism Free Online FlashCards

Study 03 Consequentialism and Utilitarianism with 12 free online flashcards. Review key terms, definitions, and concepts with this interactive flashcard deck.

12 cards
01
Front

What determines an action’s moral status in consequentialism?

Back

Consequentialism holds that an action’s moral status depends on the value of its consequences.

02
Front

What does utilitarianism add to consequentialism?

Back

Utilitarianism says to promote overall good, counting each affected person’s good impartially.

03
Front

How do utilitarian theories differ in what counts as welfare?

Back

Classical utilitarians such as Bentham and Mill chiefly identified the good with happiness or pleasure and the avoidance of suffering. Contemporary views may focus on preference satisfaction, well-being, or other goods.

04
Front

What does it mean for utilitarianism to be maximizing?

Back

Utilitarianism is usually maximizing: it requires choosing the option with the greatest overall welfare, not merely one that is good enough.

05
Front

What does impartiality mean in utilitarianism?

Back

Impartiality means each person’s welfare counts without extra weight merely because of who they are. It does not require identical treatment when needs or consequences differ.

06
Front

What does total utilitarianism aim to maximize?

Back

Total utilitarianism seeks the greatest sum of welfare across people.

07
Front

What does average utilitarianism aim to maximize?

Back

Average utilitarianism seeks the greatest average welfare per person.

08
Front

How can utilitarianism distinguish rightness from decision-making?

Back

A theory’s standard of rightness explains what makes an action right; a decision method is a practical way to choose. Following familiar rules can be useful if doing so generally leads to better results.

09
Front

What is the rights objection to consequentialism?

Back

Critics argue that maximizing overall welfare might permit violating one person’s rights, such as punishing an innocent person, if enough others benefit.

10
Front

How might consequentialists respond to the rights objection?

Back

Consequentialists can argue that injustice, fear, and lost trust cause serious harm; rule consequentialists add that rules protecting rights may produce better outcomes when generally accepted.

11
Front

What is the separateness-of-persons objection?

Back

The separateness-of-persons objection says that benefits to many people do not automatically compensate the distinct person who suffers a severe harm.

12
Front

What is the demandingness objection?

Back

The demandingness objection says that maximizing may require sacrificing personal resources whenever they could produce more good elsewhere, leaving little room for personal projects.