True or false: The existence of moral disagreement, by itself, proves that there are no moral truths.
01 Questions and Methods in Ethics Online Quiz Questions
Use this free practice quiz with 20 questions to review 01 Questions and Methods in Ethics, test your knowledge, and prepare for your next test or exam.
A hospital must decide how to distribute a limited supply of medicine among patients. Which area of ethical inquiry directly examines what the hospital should do in this specific case?
- A
Metaethics, because the decision involves a question of right and wrong
- B
Applied ethics, because it examines what to do in a specific case
- C
Normative ethics, because it studies only the meaning of moral words
- D
Moral disagreement, because more than one patient may be affected
What area of ethical inquiry asks whether moral claims are capable of being true or false?
In deductive reasoning, a valid argument with true premises is .
True or false: Moral reasoning can involve revising a judgment, not only reaching an initial conclusion.
- A
True
- B
False
In an argument, what is the singular term for a claim offered as a reason for the conclusion?
Which option lists three broad approaches considered in normative ethics?
- A
Privacy, medical decisions, and environmental responsibilities
- B
Truth, meaning, and the status of moral claims
- C
Virtue ethics, deontology, and consequentialism
- D
Factual beliefs, social practices, and personal experiences
In moral reasoning, one should identify relevant and consider who may be by a possible action.
Select all questions that directly help assess the quality of an argument.
- A
Whether the premises are credible
- B
Whether the argument uses emotionally forceful wording
- C
Whether the premises support the conclusion
- D
Whether important information has been left out
- E
Whether the conclusion is popular
Two people both value fairness, but one thinks fairness requires equal treatment while the other thinks it requires more help for those in greater need. Which best describes their disagreement?
- A
They disagree about whether fairness is a moral value at all
- B
They share a value but interpret its requirements differently
- C
They have established that fairness has no objective meaning
- D
They disagree only because one person lacks relevant facts
Select all factors that can help explain why people disagree about a moral question.
- A
Different factual beliefs
- B
Different background assumptions
- C
The mere existence of disagreement proving that every view is equally justified
- D
Different priorities or interpretations of a situation
Why might applying an ethical principle to a specific policy or choice fail to produce an automatic answer?
- A
Ethical principles apply only to personal decisions, not policies
- B
Specific cases cannot involve more than one moral value
- C
Applied ethics avoids reasoning about facts
- D
People may disagree about relevant facts, how to interpret a principle, or how to weigh conflicting values
Which statement best describes the difference between deductive arguments and many ethical arguments that weigh competing considerations?
- A
Deductive arguments weigh competing considerations, while nondeductive arguments always make their conclusions unavoidable
- B
Deductive validity concerns necessary support from premises; many ethical arguments support conclusions by weighing considerations without making them unavoidable
- C
A nondeductive argument has no premises, while a deductive argument has only one
- D
Every ethical argument is a deductive proof if its premises are credible
A hospital has enough of a medicine for one patient, but several patients need it. Explain how applied ethics, normative ethics, and metaethics would each frame a question about this situation.
True or false: Ethics is only a record of what people or societies believe, and does not assess whether those beliefs are reasonable.
- A
True
- B
False
Which area of ethical inquiry develops general standards for conduct and examines what makes actions right or wrong?
- A
Normative ethics develops standards for conduct and examines what makes actions right or wrong.
- B
Metaethics investigates the nature and status of moral claims.
- C
Applied ethics examines specific practices, policies, and choices.
- D
Metaethics applies a moral principle to settle a particular practical case.
A committee wants to develop a general principle for allocating scarce medical resources across future cases. Which area of ethics is most directly concerned with developing such standards for conduct?
- A
Applied ethics, because it settles a particular hospital case
- B
Metaethics, because it analyzes the meaning of moral language
- C
Normative ethics, because it asks which general standards should guide conduct
- D
Metaethics, because it determines which patient has the greatest need
What area of ethical inquiry develops standards for conduct and examines what makes an action right or wrong?
Two people agree that avoidable serious harm should be prevented but disagree about whether a particular policy actually causes such harm. Which interpretation best fits this disagreement?
- A
They necessarily reject the same moral principle.
- B
Their disagreement may arise from different factual beliefs about the situation.
- C
The existence of their disagreement proves there are no moral truths.
- D
They must disagree about the meaning of the word “good.”
In an argument, what is the term for the claim that the premises are offered to support?