A researcher makes a claim about nutrition, but most of their training is in economics. What is the most important question to ask when assessing their expertise?
5 Evaluating Sources Online Quiz Questions
Use this free practice quiz with 20 questions to review 5 Evaluating Sources, test your knowledge, and prepare for your next test or exam.
A claim is trustworthy simply because it was published by a well-known institution. True or false?
- A
True
- B
False
What kind of judgment is source credibility, rather than a permanent label attached to an author or publisher?
To assess reliability, a reader should be able to inspect how a claim was reached through .
A company promotes a product it sells. What should this potential conflict of interest lead a reader to do?
- A
Treat the claim as false without further investigation
- B
Assume the claim is correct because the company knows its product
- C
Examine the evidence and methods carefully
- D
Ignore the source's purpose if it cites a study
A source may aim to inform, , sell, entertain, or advocate.
Select all features that can help a reader inspect how a source reached its claims.
- A
The source explains the methods used to reach its conclusions
- B
The source includes citations, whether or not they support its claims
- C
The source provides evidence that can be inspected
- D
The source uses a confident tone
- E
The source has relevant review or editing
For what kind of topic is current information essential? Enter the topic category.
Peer review guarantees that every conclusion in a scholarly study is correct. True or false?
- A
True
- B
False
A claim appears on a commercial website. How should you use the publisher's identity when deciding whether to rely on the claim?
- A
Accept it if the publisher is a familiar news organization
- B
Reject it if the publisher is an advocacy group
- C
Accept it if the publisher is an established scholarly journal
- D
Treat the publisher as context and examine the specific source and claim
A supplement company's website claims its product improves memory. Select all checks that would help evaluate this claim.
- A
Check whether the cited studies tested the same product and outcome as the claim
- B
Rely on the company's expertise about its own product instead of checking studies
- C
Look for well-designed studies supporting the claim
- D
Check whether independent researchers or health authorities reach similar conclusions
- E
Treat an expert endorsement as sufficient proof
You are researching the historical origins of a long-established idea. How should you assess an older source's publication date?
- A
Reject any source published more than five years ago
- B
Consider whether the question is historical or foundational, or whether the topic changes rapidly
- C
Prefer the newest source regardless of the topic
- D
Ignore publication dates if the author is an expert
A company's website claims that its supplement improves memory and links to one study. Describe how you would evaluate whether the claim is credible for this use.
An author with advanced training in chemistry makes a claim about a recent economic policy. What is the best first step in evaluating the author's authority for this claim?
- A
Accept the claim because the author has advanced credentials in any field.
- B
Check whether the author's expertise matches the specific claim.
- C
Rely on the author's institutional affiliation instead of assessing the claim.
- D
Reject the claim because no author can be an expert.
A familiar public agency publishes a claim outside its usual area of work. How should you use the agency's identity when evaluating the claim?
- A
Treat the claim as accurate if the publisher is familiar.
- B
Reject the claim if the publisher is an advocacy group.
- C
Use the publisher's identity as context, then assess the source and its evidence.
- D
Assume the publisher's reputation proves the author has relevant expertise.
A source has a financial interest in persuading readers. That interest is a reason to examine its evidence carefully, but it does not by itself prove the source's claim false.
- A
True
- B
False
For rapidly changing topics, what does the material say is essential?
A peer-reviewed study makes a conclusion that matters to your research. What is the most appropriate interpretation of its peer-review status?
- A
It can strengthen confidence, but conclusions still need to be assessed.
- B
It establishes that every conclusion in the study is correct.
- C
It makes checking the study's methods unnecessary.
- D
It guarantees that independent sources will reach the same conclusion.
Complete the idea: A source's credibility is a reasoned judgment about how well it supports a ____.
You are researching the origins of a long-established scientific concept and find a well-supported older source. How should you assess its age?
- A
Treat it as unreliable because it is not the newest source available.
- B
Use it only if it has been updated within the last year.
- C
Assume its age makes it more reliable for any question.
- D
Consider whether it suits the question; older sources can help with historical or foundational questions.