6 Skepticism and Its Challenges Online Quiz Questions

True or false: If a medicine has helped many observed patients, that evidence logically guarantees that it will help the next patient.

You know that your own pain is often accompanied by certain behavior. Another person behaves similarly when injured. Which conclusion best reflects the argument from analogy?

In ordinary conversation, a person says they know a desk is nearby. In a philosophical discussion, someone demands that they rule out far-fetched skeptical scenarios. Which view best explains why the standards for saying “knows” might shift between these settings?

Which approaches are presented as ways to understand or defend inductive practice without claiming to deductively prove that induction must succeed? Select all that apply.

What theory family allows a belief produced by a reliable process to count as knowledge even when the knower cannot independently prove that the process is reliable?

True or false: Moore responded to the skeptical argument by starting from the claim that he knew he had hands and inferring that the skeptical scenario was false.

Why does the argument “Induction has worked in the past, so it will work again” fail to provide a non-circular justification of induction?

Which are presented as possible grounds for knowledge of other people's thoughts or feelings, despite not providing direct access to their experiences? Select all that apply.

What is the name of the reasoning method that uses observed cases to support conclusions about unobserved cases?

A philosopher argues that a belief can qualify as knowledge even if some conceivable possibility of error has not been eliminated. Which view does this position express?

A philosopher responds to skepticism by arguing that certain facts the skeptic questions are necessary for coherent experience or thought. What kind of argument is this?

Compare foundationalism, coherentism, and infinitism as responses to the problem of epistemic regress. Explain how each view structures the support for justified belief.

In an ordinary conversation, someone says they know there is a desk nearby. During a philosophical discussion, the conversation shifts to whether they can rule out an elaborate skeptical scenario. Which view explains why the standard for saying “knows” may change with this shift?

A fallibilist can maintain that a person knows something even if the person’s evidence does not rule out every conceivable possibility of error.

A person notices that their own pain is associated with certain behavior and that another person behaves similarly when apparently hurt. Which traditional reply to the problem of other minds uses this reasoning?

What theory of justification says that beliefs are justified through their mutual support within a coherent system, rather than by resting on a single foundation?

A person forms a belief through a reliable perceptual process but cannot independently prove that the process is reliable. According to an externalist theory such as reliabilism, what follows?

What theory of justification allows a belief’s support to involve an endless chain of reasons?