A homeowner promises to pay a painter in exchange for the painter's promise to paint the home. Which feature of this arrangement supplies consideration?
2 Contracts Online Quiz Questions
Use this free practice quiz with 20 questions to review 2 Contracts, test your knowledge, and prepare for your next test or exam.
An event specified in a contract that triggers, suspends, or discharges a duty is a .
Under the common-law substantial-performance doctrine, a contractor who completes a house using a slightly different but equivalent pipe may have substantially performed, although the other party may still recover for the defect.
- A
True
- B
False
Two parties use words and conduct that would lead a reasonable person to believe they agreed, but one party privately intended something else. How is mutual assent generally assessed?
- A
Whether both parties privately intended the same thing, regardless of what they said or did
- B
Whether the parties' words and conduct would lead a reasonable person to understand that they agreed
- C
Whether the written terms provide equal economic value to both parties
- D
Whether each party later agrees that the contract was beneficial
A promise lacks ordinary consideration, but another party reasonably and foreseeably relies on it, and enforcement may be necessary to avoid injustice. What doctrine may support enforcement?
The parol evidence rule does not categorically exclude every form of evidence outside a final written agreement.
- A
True
- B
False
Under common law, an offeree responds to an offer by agreeing but changing one of its terms. What is the usual effect of that response?
- A
It automatically accepts the offer because the original terms remain mostly unchanged
- B
It is always ineffective and cannot be treated as a new proposal
- C
It is ordinarily a counteroffer because it changes a term
- D
It forms a contract only if the parties later exchange equal economic value
A breach serious enough to undermine the bargain and potentially excuse the other party's remaining performance is a .
Which circumstances may provide a defense to enforcement of a contract? Select all that apply.
- A
A party lacked legally sufficient capacity
- B
A party was induced by a material false statement
- C
Improper pressure undermined voluntary assent
- D
Both parties shared a material mistake about a basic assumption
- E
A party later decided the agreed price was inconvenient
A seller fails to deliver goods. The buyer reasonably pays 950 dollars for replacements, although the contract price was 800 dollars. What is the price difference, in dollars?
Which statements correctly describe consequential damages and the injured party's responsibility for avoidable loss? Select all that apply.
- A
The loss was sufficiently foreseeable when the parties contracted
- B
The loss can be proven
- C
The injured party took reasonable steps to limit avoidable losses
- D
The injured party can recover the same loss again under another label
A seller breaches an agreement to transfer a unique parcel of land, and money damages would not adequately address the loss. Which remedy may a court consider?
- A
It is the usual remedy for every breach, even when money fully compensates the loss
- B
It may be available when money damages are inadequate, such as in some disputes over unique property
- C
It automatically applies whenever a contract includes a written promise
- D
It allows an injured party to recover the same loss twice
Punitive damages are generally unavailable for an ordinary breach of contract, though a separate legal claim or statute may produce a different result.
- A
True
- B
False
A sales contract's phrase "standard grade" is reasonably open to more than one meaning. The parties have a final written agreement and a history of performing under it. Explain how a court may interpret the phrase and whether the parol evidence rule necessarily bars considering relevant evidence of the parties' performance or trade practices.
A homeowner promises to pay a painter in exchange for the painter’s promise to paint the homeowner’s house. Which statement best describes consideration for this agreement?
- A
The painter’s promise to paint is consideration, but the homeowner’s promise to pay is not.
- B
The homeowner’s promise to pay and the painter’s promise to paint are consideration for each other.
- C
The arrangement has consideration only if the price equals the market value of the painting work.
- D
The arrangement lacks consideration because neither party has performed yet.
A retailer publishes an ordinary advertisement for a product, without unusual details or language showing a definite commitment to sell. Under the general rule described in the materials, how is the advertisement most likely treated?
- A
It is often an invitation to negotiate rather than an offer, though context matters.
- B
It is always an offer that any customer can accept.
- C
It is an acceptance of an offer made by every potential customer.
- D
It is automatically irrevocable once it has been published.
Which agreement is a common example of one that may need to satisfy a statute of frauds by meeting a signed-writing or other qualifying-record requirement?
- A
A casual promise to give a friend a birthday gift.
- B
A painter’s promise to complete a small repair immediately.
- C
An agreement to sell land.
- D
A promise to pay for a service after it has already been completed.
A minor enters an agreement in circumstances where the governing law recognizes a capacity defense. Which outcome best matches the general rule in the materials?
- A
The agreement is automatically enforceable in every circumstance.
- B
The minor may have a right to avoid the agreement, subject to exceptions.
- C
The other party alone may cancel the agreement for any reason.
- D
The agreement is automatically void, with no possible exceptions.
What category of contract damages may compensate a party for reasonable expenditures made because of a promise, often when expectation damages are difficult to establish?
What doctrine may allow enforcement of a promise without ordinary consideration when reasonable, foreseeable reliance makes enforcement necessary to avoid injustice?